#1 [url]

Dec 10 02 4:52 PM

After reading all the posts I feel Kutuzov
would of allowed the player to keep his divisional commander if he hadn't as appears to of been the case so close to the brigade commander and the troops in melee.

I think you have to use a bit of common sense here.

If both the DC and the BC are good way from the cause of the double 6 throw and the DC is nearer but behind a building or village with the BC in a more visible position then as DCRB suggests I think most players would play fair and take the BC or dice for it.

I wonder if Dale D Smith would of received any support from his fellow commanders if the nearest visible BC had belonged to someone else and to save his DC they'd to lose their general.

Dale D Smith appears to have been looking for a way out of a mess he's got himself into by moving his DC so close to the action
for the benefit of the +2 for being in base to base contact with the BC.


[This message has been edited by percy (edited 10 December 2002).]

[This message has been edited by percy (edited 10 December 2002).]

[This message has been edited by percy (edited 14 December 2002).]